Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

01-35273 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 01-35273 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 319 F.3d 1079 Elaine R. MANGINI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Defendant, and Dick Gottsegen, dba Timberline Adventures, aka Timberline Bicycle Tours, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-35273. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 4, 2002. Filed January 9, 2003. Amended February 10, 2003. Sue Ann Love, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, P.C., Great Falls, MT, for the defendant-appellant. Fra
More

319 F.3d 1079

Elaine R. MANGINI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Defendant, and
Dick Gottsegen, dba Timberline Adventures, aka Timberline Bicycle Tours, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-35273.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted November 4, 2002.

Filed January 9, 2003.

Amended February 10, 2003.

Sue Ann Love, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, P.C., Great Falls, MT, for the defendant-appellant.

Francis X. Clinch, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, P.C., Great Falls, MT, for the defendant-appellant.

Joseph P. Cosgrove, Hoyt & Blewett, Great Falls, MT, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; Donald W. Molloy, Chief District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-00061-DWM.

Before: TROTT, NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The Opinion filed January 9, 2003, is amended as follows:

2

At Slip Opinion page 227, line 33: delete footnote 2, and replace with a new footnote 2 stating, "Because of the additional evidence that has come to light, we need not consider whether we would reach a different result were we reviewing Judge Malloy's decision on the record before him."

3

At Slip Opinion page 227, line 25 [after sentence "We also note that the record of Jackson's contacts with the expert is incomplete...."]: add the following sentence, "As the record stands, we find no direct evidence of an intent to deceive Judge Molloy, but nevertheless, Jackson clearly acted as a lawyer in the proceeding and Hoyt & Blewett failed to disclose all the relevant facts."

4

With these amendments to the Opinion, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellee's petition for a rehearing.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer